Signal Check helps you examine a link, separate claims from evidence, and keep a record of what you find.
01 / Start with the source
What are you looking at?
02 / Look for the trail
Your source, at a glance.
A link tells us where to look. It does not tell us whether the content is true or who made it.
Browser-only check
01
What we can observe
Optional: fetch publisher details
Where supported, Weidu can request the public page and its robots policy, then show a short metadata record. The publisher will receive a request from the service.
Automatic fetching in this beta: example.com, weidufanling.au, NASA, ONS, ABS, GOV.UK, W3C and c2pa.org, on listed hosts only. Other links use this guided check.
?
Authenticity: what is still unknown
Who is behind it? Open the original publisher or channel’s About page. Look for an accountable author and clear disclosures.
Where did it begin? Find the original upload, publication date and earlier versions. Reposts can lose context.
What supports the claim? Follow the source to a document, dataset or first-hand record. Check dates, methods and what it actually says.
What has been edited? Ask for the original media or provenance record. This beta does not inspect audio, video, images or validate C2PA credentials.
A convincing voice, an AI disclosure, or missing metadata does not settle whether a claim is true. This tool makes no finding that a person or channel is fake or AI-generated.
Publisher-reported metadata
These are statements in the retrieved page, not independently verified identities, dates or facts.
See the request record and limits
03 / Put the evidence beside the claim
A claim is a starting point.
Write the exact statement, then record what a source does and does not support. These are your notes and assessments; the tool does not verify them.
04 / Leave a clear record
Keep the uncertainty visible.
Notes are editable. Download a new record after any correction; no public report is published here.
Nothing is saved to browser storage by this app. Use Clear this check before leaving; your browser may retain page memory in its history. Downloaded files remain on your device until you delete them.
Show the working
A check you can inspect.
Method v0.1 · Public beta Built for learning and careful reading.
Local observations. We read the structure of the link in your browser. A domain name and HTTPS connection do not establish credibility.
Optional retrieval. With your consent, the service checks its supported-host list and robots policy before fetching limited page metadata. It does not bypass login, payment or access restrictions. Retrieval can fail or be incomplete.
Human evidence notes. You choose the claim, source and relationship. Search results and repeated claims are leads, not independent corroboration. Follow the underlying evidence and credit its creator.
Explicit limits. There is no LLM call, hidden truth score or synthetic-media detector. C2PA provenance concerns origin and editing history; it does not by itself establish factual accuracy. No C2PA validation runs in this beta.
Privacy, attribution and corrections
This app does not use analytics, application cookies, browser storage or a report database. The hosting layer may set security cookies, including Cloudflare bot-management cookies. Optional fetches send the entered public URL to the hosting service, which may process connection logs. Publishers receive retrieval requests. External links and searches contact their own providers only when you open them. Avoid personal, confidential or token-bearing links.
Fetched metadata is attributed to the source URL and retrieval time. Short extracts are provided for examination; rights remain with their creators. A blocked or missing field is not evidence of deception. Do not republish someone else’s content or a damaging allegation on the strength of this record.
Correct your notes here and export again. Reports include a method version and uncertainty. Service-wide corrections can be raised through the Weidu website; this beta has no submission or moderation inbox.
Accessibility and feedback
The interface uses labelled controls, keyboard navigation, visible focus, responsive layouts and text in addition to colour. The WCAG 2.2 guidelines guide the design. A full accessibility audit and assistive-technology user testing are still needed. Use the downloadable plain JSON record or browser print view if helpful.
If the automatic page fetch cannot read a source, open it directly and record what you can establish. Dynamic pages, social media and videos may need that manual route.